Consumer advocate, WV Energy Users Group jointly request Century - WOWK 13 Charleston, Huntington WV News, Weather, Sports

Century rate clarification and rate reconsideration are both requested

Posted: Updated:
  • Local NewsLocal NewsMore>>

  • UPDATE: Route 2 now open following tractor trailer accident

    UPDATE: Route 2 now open following tractor trailer accident

    Monday, August 25 2014 4:00 PM EDT2014-08-25 20:00:48 GMT
    A tractor trailer is blocking part of Route 2. The road is closed until further notice. Drivers heading in both direction are being asked to use the Big Ben Bowen Highway connector by Target to get around.
    A tractor trailer is blocking part of Route 2. The road is closed until further notice. Drivers heading in both direction are being asked to use the Big Ben Bowen Highway connector by Target to get around.

The case for Century Aluminum's Ravenswood smelter is still not closed.

The West Virginia Energy Users Group and the Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia on Oct. 26 jointly filed a motion for clarification of the electricity rate the PSC approved in an Oct. 4 order.

For the full PDF of the motion, click here.

That order asks for clarification to the issue of refunds to ratepayers to be sure ratepayers are paid first before any electricity rates for Century are lowered because of a favorable uptick in the aluminum market.

According to the motion, the CAD and WVEUG think the PSC order "implies that there could be some form of sharing ... which would not necessarily maintain repayment of ratepayers as the first priority."

The joint motion from the CAD and WVEUG described their request for clarification as under "an abundance of caution."

Century Aluminum and Appalachian Power also filed motions Oct. 26 for reconsideration of the rate.  Click here to read Century Aluminum's petition for reconsideration.  Click here to read Appalachian Power's petition for reconsideration.

Century Aluminum contends in its petition the PSC's special rate does not increase any risk or burden on all other Appalachian Power Company ratepayers, but it keeps the prospect of a reward for those customers if the aluminum market draws in higher prices.

Century's petition proposes two different modifications to the special rate: one dubbed the "Future Restart" and one called the "Immediate Restart," which the company states will allow the Ravenswood plant to reopen in mid-2013.

Century's petition claims the special rate does not provide predictability to electric costs, and Century's parent corporation will not guarantee any deficits at the end of Century's contract, which the special rate demands.

Century's petition also requests a clarification to how the state tax credits permitted by the West Virginia Legislature this year will be administered.

As for Appalachian Power Company's petition, a "further evidentiary hearing" was proposed if it is needed to clarify any issues that were not fully explored during the July 30-Aug. 1, 2012 evidentiary hearings.

Appalachian Power asks in its petition for clarity regarding the corporate guarantee for any shortfalls.

"The magnitude of such shortfalls is indeterminate, but the evidentiary record supports that it could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars," the Appalachian Power petition reads.

This is the issue Appalachian Power stated was never brought up during the evidentiary hearings as a possibility, so it may need further examination.

According to the company's petition, its review of Century's finances "discloses legitimate causes for concern," in part because the S&P has rated Century's credit as "B."

"There is no question that the Commission intends that Century and Century Aluminum Company be responsible for any accumulated shortfalls in the Special Rate Mechanism Tracking Account over the life of the special rate contract," the petition reads. 

Appalachian Power states in its petition that it has funded all special rate shortfalls from Century's past 10 years, and continuing to saddle Appalachian Power with an uncollected shortfall "would not be a balanced and equitable outcome."

Appalachian Power points out that such shortfalls would be unpredictable, and the PSC should increase its review of Century's standing.

The PSC extended the deadline for parties to the case to formally ask for a rate reconsideration to Oct. 26 after Century Aluminum requested that extension.

Century Aluminum announced Oct. 9 that it would not be able to reopen its Jackson County smelter under the rate the PSC approved, because that rate did not allow some of the adjustments Century had requested.

To view our previous coverage of this story, click here.

The Ravenswood plant closed in 2009, and 650 jobs were lost because of it. Plant retirees also lost their health benefits, but part of the latest agreement for a new rate was for retirees to regain their benefits.

The PSC issued a 70-page decision that stated that it had tried to balance the interests of all parties to the case.

The special rate sets a minimum monthly payment for electricity, but it also allows an electricity rate tied to the market price of aluminum.

Any deviation from the minimum price would be kept in a "tracking account."  The rate also requires Century to guarantee any deficits at the end of the power contract. The rate allows a continuance of $20 million that other ratepayers took on when the plant closed in 2009 because of fixed costs, but if there is an excess in Century's "tracking account," the first $20 million would be returned to ratepayers, and if there is excess money beyond $20 million, it will be divided at a rate of 75 percent to Century and 25 percent to other ratepayers.

PSC Consumer Advocate Byron Harris said shortly after the PSC's rate decision the $22.7 million deficit Century accumulated through its prior rate agreement will still fall to other ratepayers.

"It's like a mortgage, you can make the payments cheap on it, but at the end of the day, you'll still have to pay $22.7 million," Harris said. "It's certainly better than anything Century proposed, ... but it's not a complete protection for other customers, which is what we were after."

Harris also said at the time that a corporate guarantee would still be only as good as the corporation.