KRISTIN M. HALL, Associated Press
NASHVILLE, TN (AP) — The University of Tennessee wants
to allow hydraulic fracturing to extract natural gas on a state-owned
tract of rolling woodland, raising the hackles of environmentalists who
question its stated goal of raising funds to research the environmental
impact of such drilling.
With debate over "fracking" continuing,
the unique proposal is being considered when many universities say they
don't have enough money to properly study the environmental implications
of an increasingly popular and lucrative method for energy companies to
remove gas or oil from rock formations by forcing liquids underground
at high pressure.
"We have not been able to find any instances of a
university drilling on their land and funding their research with
revenues from the drilling activities," said Gwen Parker, a
Nashville-based staff attorney for the Southern Environmental Law
Center. Her group is taking a lead in trying to block the move, saying
the university's proposal raises ethical concerns.
The university
is requesting permission from the state to allow an outside company to
drill on about 8,000 acres of mature woodlands it maintains as an
outdoor laboratory in the Cumberland Plateau — all while performing
research on the effects on water quality, air quality and ground
impacts.
University officials argue that because the property is
state-owned, they can maintain control over the drilling project, and
provide independent scientific results in an area of the industry where
many environmental questions remain.
On Friday, the university
will present its proposal on the project to a subcommittee of State
Building Commission, which will decide whether to allow the university
to seek bids from companies. Environmental groups are planning a rally
and news conference before the 2 p.m. session.
Parker called the
proposal a "fundamental conflict of interest." She argued that the
university risks its credibility by funding research with the very
proceeds from such drilling. Other environmental groups have joined in
the opposition, although Gov. Bill Haslam is supportive.
Environmentalists
also argue that preservation of the particular forest tract in question
is critical because it is one of the few mature forests still intact in
the state's Cumberland Mountains region.
Without an appraisal, it
was unclear how much revenues such drilling could yield though some
said it could potentially be lucrative in the range of millions of
dollars annually.
Shale formations undergird a wide swath of
Appalachia, crossing several states. Hydraulic fracturing has touched
off a boom of sorts, making enormous reserves of natural gas accessible
where previous methods could not. Natural gas is extracted using large
volumes of water, plus sand and chemicals, injected deep underground to
break rock apart, freeing the gas. But environmentalists say the fluids
could pollute water sources and methane leaks could cause air pollution.
"There
are questions surrounding natural gas extraction and we have the
facilities, and we have the faculty, so have obligation to investigate
in an unbiased, scientific way to provide those answers," said Dr. Bill
Brown, dean for research and director of the University of Tennessee
Agricultural Experiment Station.
Other universities that have
studied fracking have faced criticism about their scientific findings
after discovering that researchers had ties to the energy industry.
The
University of Texas at Austin recently said it would create a group of
outside experts to review that school's Energy Institute, which issued a
report on environmental effects from gas without disclosing that the
lead researcher was also being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars by
an energy company.
And in May, a report from New York's University
at Buffalo generated similar controversy because of the researcher's
ties to the gas industry.
Brown said the faculty who would work on
the project if it's approved would be screened for outside
relationships with industry contacts. He said other funding sources,
such as federal or state grants, would be sought. He also rejected any
notion that possible involvement by an energy company in the project
would affect research findings.
"We need to get past this notion
that if the university works with an industry, that somehow we are
compromised or tainted," Brown said. "Ultimately, many of the
technologies that our faculty develops are going to be delivered to the
market through the industry."
Parker, meanwhile, said the
university has attempted to push this proposal through the approval
process without getting an independent appraisal of the value of the
property or the natural gas below ground. She also said there hasn't
been enough time to get details about the project.
Pittsburgh-based
Consol Energy Inc. hired Bryan Kaegi, a fundraiser for Haslam and other
prominent Tennessee Republicans, to help shepherd the proposal through
the approval process.
Kaegi, who has not registered as a lobbyist,
said in the correspondence with school officials that he had met with
the governor and environmental officials to make the case for the
program. Kaegi did not return messages seeking comment.
Brown said
if the subcommittee approves the university's request to seek bids,
they will have to evaluate those and go back to the State Building
Commission for final approval.